What makes us groove?

Hakemuksen tiivistelmä

If you would visit a museum that is showcasing early human cultures (The British Museum in London, for example), there would almost certainly be a few sections relating to our ancestors’ musical activities around the globe. It is known that ancient humans danced and made music, for instance, during dry seasons to beg for rain, or during agriculture and hunting to have enough food to survive. In fact, to observe the relatedness of dance and music and their significance in our lives, one does not need to travel in time. If we look at babies, we see that they are sensitive to movement patterns to music as early as 7 months of age (Phillips-Silver & Trainor, 2005). This could be because music is so rewarding. It captures our attention easily, gives us pleasure, makes us dance, and makes us feel connected to other people. In the field of musicology, this combination of musical experiences relates to the concept of groove. Previous groove literature demonstrated its applications in interpersonal synchronisation and social interaction, prosocial behaviour, clinical groups with perception, and both motor- and mood-related problems. The primary motivation of my dissertation is to explore granularity of groove from various angles by using multiple naturalistic methodical approaches. The goal is to help us better understand the variables that influence people’s groove experiences. In developing previous literature, in my dissertation first, I proposed an updated comprehensive and contemporary working definition of groove. Second, the findings suggested that the concept of groove is closely linked to functions of music listening such as “regulation of mood and arousal” and “expression of social relatedness”. Third, with additional studies I contributed to development of a musicological model of groove. Finally, I investigated an under-researched aspect related to groove, namely how naturalistic groove-related music is processed in the brain.

Thanks to the Kone grant, the recipient completed her PhD titled “What makes us groove?” Her research focuses on how music captures attention, gives pleasure, makes people dance, and fosters social connection, all of which relate to the concept of groove. Over the past two decades, groove research has expanded, exploring variables that influence groove experiences and its applications in social interaction and clinical settings, particularly for perception, motor, and affect-related issues. However, it remains unclear how groove experiences are shaped, with recent studies calling for further investigation into the variables, mechanisms, and neural bases of groove.

The dissertation aimed to explore the nuances of groove through various naturalistic approaches. It presented novel findings on (i) the concept of groove, (ii) musical features associated with groove, (iii) listener experiences, (iv) listener characteristics and goals, and (v) the neural processing of groove. These findings were framed within an ecological perspective, utilizing the psychological concept of affordances.

Notably, the dissertation offered an updated, comprehensive working definition of groove as a multifaceted, participatory experience. It suggested that groove is closely linked to music’s role in regulating mood and arousal. Additional studies on music listening motivations and personality traits contributed to the development of a psychological model of groove. The thesis also explored how the brain processes groove-related music, a less-researched area.

In the discussion, the dissertation highlighted the complex, multidimensional nature of groove, presented four types of pleasure associated with groove, and discussed the relevance of studying groove in both clinical and non-clinical settings, proposing applications in areas such as education.